The Champions of Europe Home a 360 Investigation a What We Learned:ASouthampton By EKVR a 30, 2013 An dreadful performance from Chelsea even as we fell 2-1 to Southampton at Saint Maryas. Rodriguez put them in front then Terry went home to equalize simply to see Lambert put Soaton back front 1 second later. Scorers : Stats : What We Learned : 1. Itas not absolutely all Rafaas problem 2. No Mata = No hope 3. Ryan Bertrand doesnat deserve to start out 4. Torres and Ba should be given a start together 5. Lampard-Mikel doesnat work 1. Itas not absolutely all Rafaas fault: A solid squad was fielded by rafa Benitez with all the players being on international break and with the busy routine coming up, yet the fans continue steadily to blame him for a loss. His alterations werenat great (bar Hazard), but that group was adequate to win. What that group didnat have may be the concluding capacity, interest and want to get. We're able to of scored many goals, but didnat due to the lack of finishing. We obtained an equalizer which will of turned the match in our favour, but a stupid foul generated we that are put by a goal down. We'd the ability to win the match, but we didnat. So just why is Rafa being blamed? Itas not his fault that Mata was out, itas not his fault that we couldnat finish or play with passion. 2. No Mata = No hope: Juan Mata does not have any doubt been our best player in 2013 and his absence (as a result of illness) cost us dearly. Heas the author, the genius, the best of the best for Chelsea. We struggle, when he doesnat play. We're able to of done much more with Mata in the group. I donat know what else to say actually, heas only what makes us, us. Chelsea need Juan Mata to stay good sort, but the game was made by his absence today so much tougher specially since heas essential, IMO. 3. Ryan Bertrand doesnat deserve to start: Did not enter the overall game in early stages and gave away the free-kick that Lambert scored from. When he did break forward his remaining basketball was bad. A lack of communication nearly allow Ward-Prowse in.AHe hasnat been at his best at all of this period and particularly in Europe. After receiving torn apart by Shakhtar earlier in the season, he fought as well in this match. Itas not that heas no fit as a substitute to Ashley Cole, itas just that heas not fit at this time in the season. Once we haven't any fit alternative as of this moment the decision to resign Ashley Cole was a great decision. He was poor against Steaua (1st leg) and this is just another effectiveness to forget for him. 4. Ba and Torres must be given a start together: Once you view Torres of late, he often drifts vast and wants to just take on the whole back in a one on one situation, often obtaining the better of them. He appears to prefer to mix it up, fall back, go wide and make an effort to build rather than be a goal man. As an extensive striker.AThe Spaniard also includes a great ability to cross the ball, which may be met with a target keen Demba Ba in the middle if he is started this might be used successfully. How usually have we seen crosses can be found in of late, with no body in the centre to meet up them? Torres are frequently out of place for a center forward, using their own hunger to have the ball at his feet, where he wants it.AI truly genuinely believe that a confident Torres could be a very dangerous prospect out on the left, beating his whole back, cutting in on his right foot and shooting in a curling energy in to the top right-hand corner.AI feel this will function as only real effective way to play equally Ba and Torres and could resolve a number of our concluding issues, possibly. 5. Lampard-Mikel doesnat work: Lampard :ALampard was maintained largely off the ball by way of a principal Saints midfield. Found much more room following the break but nevertheless a below-par showing. Mikel :AAllowed Davis and others a lot of room in the middle in the first half. Changed by Ramires in the second half. This combination just doesnat work, I canat stress it enough. Mikel is underrated. In all these games that individuals found the Lampard a' Mikel no longer working effectively, Mikel has been getting all the stick for it, for making errors, losingApossession, playing only sideways and backward passes, etc. But for me, itas not Mikel, but Frank Lampard, who rather than remaining with Mikel, and helping with the transition between defense and attack keeps forward, which leaves Mikel to deal with the position of two people, which causes issues for him and for the group, leaving us neither good defensively, or attackingly. Mikel does, or tries to complete the task of two players on his own, yet heas the one who faces critique while Lampard is hailed for rating penalties. Different Points : 1. Marko Marin is reasonable 2. Ivanovic has been rather horrible previously 2-3 weeks Like Loading... Classified in: 360 Evaluation, 360 Matches, Tactical Investigation, What We Learned The Champions of Europe Home a 360 Investigation a What We Learned:ASouthampton By EKVR a 30, 2013 An terrible performance from Chelsea even as we fell 2-1 to Southampton at Saint Maryas. Rodriguez put them in front then Terry went home to equalize only to see Lambert put Soaton in front 1 minute later. Scorers : Numbers : What We Learned : 1. Itas not absolutely all Rafaas mistake 2. No Mata = No wish 3. Ryan Bertrand doesnat deserve to begin 4. Torres and Ba must certanly be given a start together 5. Lampard-Mikel doesnat work 1. Itas not absolutely all Rafaas fault: A solid squad was fielded by rafa Benitez with all of the players being on global break and with the busy routine coming up, the supporters continue to blame him for a decline. His alternatives werenat great (bar Hazard), but that squad was good enough to get. What that group didnat have is the concluding capacity, interest and wish to win. We're able to of scored several targets, but didnat because of the insufficient finishing. We won an equalizer which should of turned the match within our favor, but a stupid foul generated we that are put by a goal down. We'd the capacity to win the match, but we didnat. So why is Rafa being blamed? Itas not his fault that Mata was out, itas not his fault that we couldnat finish or play with love. 2. No Mata = No hope: Juan Mata doesn't have doubt been our best player in 2013 and his absence (due to illness) cost us dearly. Heas the founder, the genius, the best of the best for Chelsea. When he doesnat play, we struggle. We could of done a lot more with Mata in the group. I donat know what else to state really, we are made by heas just what, us. Chelsea need Juan Mata to be in good form, but his absence today made the game so much harder specially since heas essential, IMO. 3. Ryan Bertrand doesnat deserve to start: Failed to get in the overall game early on and gave away the free-kick that Lambert scored from. Was poor when he did break forward his remaining ball. Deficiencies in communication nearly allow Ward-Prowse in.AHe hasnat been at his best at all this year and specially in Europe. After finding torn apart by Shakhtar earlier in the summer season, he struggled as well in this match. Itas not that heas no fit as a substitute to Ashley Cole, itas only that heas not fit now in the season. The decision to resign Ashley Cole was a fantastic decision as we haven't any healthy alternative around this moment. He was poor against Steaua (1st leg) and this is merely another performance to forget for him. 4. Ba and Torres must certanly be given a start together: He often drifts wide and wants to just take on the whole back in a one on one situation, often getting the better of these, whenever you watch Torres of late. He generally seems to choose to drop right back, mix it up, get wide and try to develop rather than be described as a goal person. This could be used successfully as a broad striker.AThe Spaniard even includes a great capability to cross the ball, which would be achieved by a purpose eager Demba Ba at the heart if he is used. How usually have we seen crosses can be found in recently, with no one in the middle to meet up them? Torres are frequently out of position for a centre forward, using his own hunger to get the ball at his feet, where he enjoys it.AI truly think that a confident Torres could be a very dangerous possibility out on the left, whipping his entire back, cutting in on his right foot and firing in a curling effort in to the top right-hand corner.AI feel this will function as only efficient way to perform equally Ba and Torres and could solve a few of our concluding problems, probably. 5. Lampard-Mikel doesnat work: Lampard :ALampard was kept mostly off the ball with a dominant Saints midfield. Found a bit more room following the break but still a below-par showing. Mikel :AAllowed Davis and the others too much room at the center in the initial half. Replaced by Ramires in the next half. This combination basically doesnat function, I canat stress it enough. Mikel is underrated. In all these activities that individuals found the Lampard a' Mikel not working effectively, Mikel has been getting all the stick for it, for making errors, losingApossession, playing only sideways and backward moves, etc. But for me, itas not Mikel, but Frank Lampard, who in the place of remaining with Mikel, and assisting with the transition between defense and attack remains forward, which leaves Mikel to deal with the part of two different people, which causes problems for him and for the group, leaving us neither good defensively, or attackingly. Mikel does, or tries to accomplish the work of two players by himself, yet heas usually the one who faces criticism while Lampard is hailed for score charges. Different Points : 1. Marko Marin is reasonable 2. Ivanovic has been quite horrible before 2-3 weeks Like Loading... Classified in: 360 Analysis, 360 Suits, Tactical Research, What We Learned . Theme: by .
No comments:
Post a Comment